FourKites vs Shadowfax
FourKites vs Shadowfax, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: FourKites is on 67/100 and Shadowfax on 59/100.
Where each one leads
FourKites
- our overall score: 67/100 against 59/100
- domain rating: 71/100 against 62/100
Shadowfax
- funding raised: $1.2B against $242M
At a glance
| Measure | FourKites | Shadowfax |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Real-time supply chain visibility and orchestration platform powered by AI. | Technology-driven third-party logistics provider for e-commerce and express parcel delivery in India. |
| Category | LogisticsTech, Supply Chain, Enterprise Software, SaaS | LogisticsTech, Supply Chain, Fleet Management, E-commerce |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2014 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | Chicago, United States | Bengaluru, India |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | FourKites | Shadowfax |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 555 | Not published |
| Total funding | $242M | $1.2B |
| Latest round | Corporate Round (Strategic Investment) | Post-IPO Equity |
| Valuation | $1.0B | $750M |
| LinkedIn followers | 77,986 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | FourKites | Shadowfax |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 67/100 | 59/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 40/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 29/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (53/100) | D (50/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 71/100 | 62/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | FourKites | Shadowfax |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Google Cloud |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4 |
FourKites vs Shadowfax: common questions
Which is better, FourKites or Shadowfax?
On our 0-100 score FourKites rates higher (67/100 against 59/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do FourKites and Shadowfax compare on the numbers?
FourKites leads on our overall score (67/100 against 59/100), domain rating (71/100 against 62/100). Shadowfax leads on funding raised ($1.2B against $242M).
Read the full FourKites review and pricing or the Shadowfax review and pricing. You can also browse other FourKites alternatives we track.