FourKites vs Magentic
FourKites vs Magentic, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: FourKites is on 67/100 and Magentic on 46/100.
Where each one leads
FourKites
- our overall score: 67/100 against 46/100
- domain rating: 71/100 against 8/100
- headcount: 555 against 2
- funding raised: $242M against $14.6M
- LinkedIn following: 77,986 against 187
Magentic
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | FourKites | Magentic |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Real-time supply chain visibility and orchestration platform powered by AI. | Fix bugs 10x faster with FlowLens MCP. Open source AI debugging tool that gives your AI agent complete context to debug autonomously. Stop explaining bugs. Start fixing them. |
| Category | LogisticsTech, Supply Chain, Enterprise Software, SaaS | MFG + SUPPLY CHAIN, Advanced Manufacturing, Supply Chain, Industrial Automation |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2014 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | Chicago, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | FourKites | Magentic |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 555 | 2 |
| Total funding | $242M | $14.6M |
| Latest round | Corporate Round (Strategic Investment) | Series A |
| Valuation | $1.0B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 77,986 | 187 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | FourKites | Magentic |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 67/100 | 46/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 41/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 31/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (53/100) | D (53/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 71/100 | 8/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | FourKites | Magentic |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Netlify |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Netlify |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Nuxt, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap |
| Payments | Not detected | Apple PAY |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | No | Yes |
FourKites vs Magentic: common questions
Which is better, FourKites or Magentic?
On our 0-100 score FourKites rates higher (67/100 against 46/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do FourKites and Magentic compare on the numbers?
FourKites leads on our overall score (67/100 against 46/100), domain rating (71/100 against 8/100), headcount (555 against 2), funding raised ($242M against $14.6M), LinkedIn following (77,986 against 187).
Read the full FourKites review and pricing or the Magentic review and pricing. You can also browse other FourKites alternatives we track.