FourKites vs Fundamental
FourKites vs Fundamental, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: FourKites is on 67/100 and Fundamental on 65/100.
Where each one leads
FourKites
- agent readiness: 53/100 against 44/100
- domain rating: 71/100 against 37/100
- headcount: 555 against 90
- LinkedIn following: 77,986 against 7,884
Fundamental
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | FourKites | Fundamental |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Real-time supply chain visibility and orchestration platform powered by AI. | Fundamental is an AI company building Large Tabular Models (LTMs) to unlock predictive intelligence from enterprise data. |
| Category | LogisticsTech, Supply Chain, Enterprise Software, SaaS | Foundation Model, Large Tabular Model, Predictive Analytics, Enterprise AI |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2014 | 2024 |
| Headquarters | Chicago, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | FourKites | Fundamental |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 555 | 90 |
| Total funding | $242M | $255M |
| Latest round | Corporate Round (Strategic Investment) | Series A |
| Valuation | $1.0B | $1.4B |
| LinkedIn followers | 77,986 | 7,884 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | FourKites | Fundamental |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 67/100 | 65/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 30/100 |
| Community | Not published | 18/100 |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 43/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (53/100) | D (44/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 71/100 | 37/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | FourKites | Fundamental |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Framer |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager, Linkedin Insight |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
What users say
| Measure | FourKites | Fundamental |
|---|---|---|
| Community ratingVisitor votes on StartupHub | Not published | 3.5/5 from 2 votes |
FourKites vs Fundamental: common questions
Which is better, FourKites or Fundamental?
On our 0-100 score FourKites rates higher (67/100 against 65/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do FourKites and Fundamental compare on the numbers?
FourKites leads on agent readiness (53/100 against 44/100), domain rating (71/100 against 37/100), headcount (555 against 90), LinkedIn following (77,986 against 7,884).
Read the full FourKites review and pricing or the Fundamental review and pricing. You can also browse other FourKites alternatives we track.