Fourier Rehab vs Wearable Robotics
Fourier Rehab vs Wearable Robotics, compared side by side on 14 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Fourier Rehab is on 28/100 and Wearable Robotics on 52/100.
Where each one leads
Fourier Rehab
- agent readiness: 45/100 against 22/100
- funding raised: $115M against $5.0M
Wearable Robotics
- our overall score: 52/100 against 28/100
At a glance
| Measure | Fourier Rehab | Wearable Robotics |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered rehabilitation and assistive robotics for healthcare and home use. | Developing wearable robotics for neuromotor rehabilitation combined with AR/VR technologies. |
| Category | Robotics, MedTech, HealthTech, Rehabilitation Robotics | HealthTech, Robotics, Medical Devices, Rehabilitation Technology |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B, B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware, software, services | Hardware |
| Founded | 2015 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Shanghai, China | Pisa, Italy |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Fourier Rehab | Wearable Robotics |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 22 |
| Total funding | $115M | $5.0M |
| Latest round | Series C | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 1,898 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Fourier Rehab | Wearable Robotics |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 28/100 | 52/100 |
| Traction | 40/100 | 47/100 |
| Team | Not published | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 13/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | 30/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (45/100) | F (22/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 52/100 | Not published |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Fourier Rehab | Wearable Robotics |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
Fourier Rehab vs Wearable Robotics: common questions
Which is better, Fourier Rehab or Wearable Robotics?
On our 0-100 score Wearable Robotics rates higher (52/100 against 28/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 14 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Fourier Rehab and Wearable Robotics compare on the numbers?
Fourier Rehab leads on agent readiness (45/100 against 22/100), funding raised ($115M against $5.0M). Wearable Robotics leads on our overall score (52/100 against 28/100).
Read the full Fourier Rehab review and pricing or the Wearable Robotics review and pricing. You can also browse other Fourier Rehab alternatives we track.