Forter vs Signifyd
Forter vs Signifyd, compared side by side on 24 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Forter is on 74/100 and Signifyd on 69/100.
Where each one leads
Forter
- our overall score: 74/100 against 69/100
- agent readiness: 71/100 against 55/100
- headcount: 711 against 496
- funding raised: $550M against $390M
Signifyd
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Forter | Signifyd |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Forter provides an AI-powered trust platform for digital commerce, preventing fraud and abuse while maximizing revenue. | Signifyd provides a Commerce Protection Platform for e-commerce retailers, offering guaranteed fraud and chargeback protection. |
| Category | Fintech, Fraud Prevention, E-commerce, Transactions | Fintech, E-Commerce Enablers, RegTech, Payments |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2013 | 2011 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | San Jose, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Forter | Signifyd |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 711 | 496 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +9.6% | Not published |
| Total funding | $550M | $390M |
| Latest round | Series E | Series E |
| Valuation | $1.0B | $1.3B |
| LinkedIn followers | 45,484 | 39,846 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Forter | Signifyd |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 74/100 | 69/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 41/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | 86/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | B (71/100) | D (55/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 77/100 | 76/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Forter | Signifyd |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Alpinejs, Tailwind CSS | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
| Agentic commerceMachine-readable checkout or agent payment rails | Stripe ACP | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
What users say
| Measure | Forter | Signifyd |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 1 positive, 0 negative across 1 thread | Not published |
“Toys“R”Us Japan has successfully integrated AI-driven fraud prevention technology from New York-based Forter, a move that has effectively eradicated fraudulent transactions while recovering lost sales tied to checkout friction. Following a ”r/japanfintech
Forter vs Signifyd: common questions
Which is better, Forter or Signifyd?
On our 0-100 score Forter rates higher (74/100 against 69/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 24 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Forter and Signifyd compare on the numbers?
Forter leads on our overall score (74/100 against 69/100), agent readiness (71/100 against 55/100), headcount (711 against 496), funding raised ($550M against $390M).
What do real users say about Forter and Signifyd?
Forter: 1 positive and 0 negative mentions across 1 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/japanfintech.
Read the full Forter review and pricing or the Signifyd review and pricing. You can also browse other Forter alternatives we track.