Fortem Technologies vs Red Cat Holdings
Fortem Technologies vs Red Cat Holdings, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Fortem Technologies is on 63/100 and Red Cat Holdings on 49/100.
Where each one leads
Fortem Technologies
- our overall score: 63/100 against 49/100
- agent readiness: 39/100 against 33/100
- domain rating: 44/100 against 35/100
- headcount: 135 against 100
- funding raised: $57.0M against $380K
Red Cat Holdings
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Fortem Technologies | Red Cat Holdings |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Develops AI-powered airspace security and defense solutions for drone threats. | Red Cat Holdings provides all-domain defense solutions, focusing on advanced drone technology and integrated command and control systems. |
| Category | Defense Tech, Drones, Drone Technology, Robotics | Defense Tech, Drone Technology, Robotics, Computer Vision |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B | B2G |
| Offering | Software | hardware | services | Hardware | software | services |
| Founded | 2016 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Lindon, United States | San Diego, USA |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Fortem Technologies | Red Cat Holdings |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 135 | 100 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +100.2% | Not published |
| Total funding | $57.0M | $380K |
| Latest round | Series B | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 11,041 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Fortem Technologies | Red Cat Holdings |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 63/100 | 49/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 48/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 19/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (39/100) | F (33/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 44/100 | 35/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Fortem Technologies | Red Cat Holdings |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Google Cloud |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
Fortem Technologies vs Red Cat Holdings: common questions
Which is better, Fortem Technologies or Red Cat Holdings?
On our 0-100 score Fortem Technologies rates higher (63/100 against 49/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Fortem Technologies and Red Cat Holdings compare on the numbers?
Fortem Technologies leads on our overall score (63/100 against 49/100), agent readiness (39/100 against 33/100), domain rating (44/100 against 35/100), headcount (135 against 100), funding raised ($57.0M against $380K).
Read the full Fortem Technologies review and pricing or the Red Cat Holdings review and pricing. You can also browse other Fortem Technologies alternatives we track.