Formula 1 vs Track160
Formula 1 vs Track160, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Formula 1 is on 76/100 and Track160 on 52/100.
Where each one leads
Formula 1
- our overall score: 76/100 against 52/100
- agent readiness: 46/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 85/100 against 29/100
- headcount: 750 against 34
- funding raised: $4.7B against $5.0M
Track160
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Formula 1 | Track160 |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | The pinnacle of motorsport, a global racing championship and entertainment property. | Automated FIFA EPTS certified football data analytics platform for clubs and leagues. |
| Category | Sports, Media & Entertainment, Automotive, Events | Sports, Analytics, Video, Data |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 1950 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Formula 1 | Track160 |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 750 | 34 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -29.6% |
| Total funding | $4.7B | $5.0M |
| Latest round | Acquisition | Series A |
| Valuation | $8.0B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 3,875 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Formula 1 | Track160 |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 76/100 | 52/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 49/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 16/100 | 30/100 |
| Quality | 94/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 85/100 | 29/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Formula 1 | Track160 |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CDN | CloudFront | Not detected |
| CMS | Ghost | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
Formula 1 vs Track160: common questions
Which is better, Formula 1 or Track160?
On our 0-100 score Formula 1 rates higher (76/100 against 52/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Formula 1 and Track160 compare on the numbers?
Formula 1 leads on our overall score (76/100 against 52/100), agent readiness (46/100 against 21/100), domain rating (85/100 against 29/100), headcount (750 against 34), funding raised ($4.7B against $5.0M).
Read the full Formula 1 review and pricing or the Track160 review and pricing. You can also browse other Formula 1 alternatives we track.