Forcepoint vs ThreatMatrix
Forcepoint vs ThreatMatrix, compared side by side on 14 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Forcepoint is on 46/100 and ThreatMatrix on 50/100.
Where each one leads
Forcepoint
- agent readiness: 37/100 against 25/100
- domain rating: 80/100 against 0/100
- funding raised: $4.9B against $865M
ThreatMatrix
- our overall score: 50/100 against 46/100
At a glance
| Measure | Forcepoint | ThreatMatrix |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Data security company focused on protecting user and data activity. | Behavioral analytics for detecting insider threats. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Data Security, AI Security, Data Loss Prevention | Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, Behavioral Analytics, Insider Threat Detection |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2015 | 2009 |
| Headquarters | Austin, USA | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Forcepoint | ThreatMatrix |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1,664 | Not published |
| Total funding | $4.9B | $865M |
| Latest round | Acquisition | Merger/Acquisition |
| Valuation | $1.1B | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Forcepoint | ThreatMatrix |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 46/100 | 50/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | Not published |
| Team | 30/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 15/100 | Not published |
| Quality | 55/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (37/100) | F (25/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 80/100 | 0/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Forcepoint | ThreatMatrix |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Netlify | AWS |
| CDN | Netlify | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Alpinejs, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
Forcepoint vs ThreatMatrix: common questions
Which is better, Forcepoint or ThreatMatrix?
On our 0-100 score ThreatMatrix rates higher (50/100 against 46/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 14 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Forcepoint and ThreatMatrix compare on the numbers?
Forcepoint leads on agent readiness (37/100 against 25/100), domain rating (80/100 against 0/100), funding raised ($4.9B against $865M). ThreatMatrix leads on our overall score (50/100 against 46/100).
Read the full Forcepoint review and pricing or the ThreatMatrix review and pricing. You can also browse other Forcepoint alternatives we track.