ForceNock vs Trusteer
ForceNock vs Trusteer, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: ForceNock is on 35/100 and Trusteer on 52/100.
Where each one leads
ForceNock
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Trusteer
- our overall score: 52/100 against 35/100
- agent readiness: 31/100 against 22/100
- domain rating: 92/100 against 0/100
- headcount: 336,401 against 2
- LinkedIn following: 19,634,427 against 157
At a glance
| Measure | ForceNock | Trusteer |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | ForceNock developed a Web Application and API Protection (WAAP) technology utilizing machine learning, behavioral, and reputation-based security engines. | IBM Trusteer provides cloud-based intelligence, backed by AI and machine learning, to identify new and existing customers and prevent fraud. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Web Application Security, API Security | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Fraud Detection, Digital Identity |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2017 | 2006 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | ForceNock | Trusteer |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 2 | 336,401 |
| Total funding | Not published | $96.0M |
| Latest round | Bootstrapped | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | 157 | 19,634,427 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | ForceNock | Trusteer |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 35/100 | 52/100 |
| Traction | 5/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 90/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 23/100 | 31/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 45/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (22/100) | F (31/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 0/100 | 92/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | ForceNock | Trusteer |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Azure |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Microsoft Clarity |
ForceNock vs Trusteer: common questions
Which is better, ForceNock or Trusteer?
On our 0-100 score Trusteer rates higher (52/100 against 35/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do ForceNock and Trusteer compare on the numbers?
Trusteer leads on our overall score (52/100 against 35/100), agent readiness (31/100 against 22/100), domain rating (92/100 against 0/100), headcount (336,401 against 2), LinkedIn following (19,634,427 against 157).
Read the full ForceNock review and pricing or the Trusteer review and pricing. You can also browse other ForceNock alternatives we track.