Fluor vs Mastec
Fluor vs Mastec, compared side by side on 13 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Fluor is on 64/100 and Mastec on 8/100.
Where each one leads
Fluor
- our overall score: 64/100 against 8/100
- domain rating: 72/100 against 63/100
Mastec
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Fluor | Mastec |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Global engineering, procurement, and construction services for complex projects across various industries. | Leading specialty contractor engineering, designing, and constructing infrastructure for electric power, oil and gas, renewable energy, and wireless networks. |
| Category | Engineering, Construction, Energy, Infrastructure | Energy Infrastructure, Oil & Gas Infrastructure, Renewable Energy Construction, Telecommunications Infrastructure |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Services | Services |
| Founded | 1912 | Not published |
| Headquarters | Irving, United States | Coral Gables, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Fluor | Mastec |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1,200 | Not published |
| Total funding | $25B | Not published |
| Latest round | Public | Not published |
| Valuation | $28B | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Fluor | Mastec |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 64/100 | 8/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | Not published |
| Team | 30/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 13/100 | 8/100 |
| Quality | 88/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (37/100) | F (36/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 72/100 | 63/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Fluor | Mastec |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | AWS |
| CDN | Vercel | CloudFront |
| Frameworks | Next.js | Bootstrap |
What users say
| Measure | Fluor | Mastec |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 0 positive, 2 negative across 6 threads |
“What an absolute shit show going from optimum to mastec. My fellow field service technicians that were with optimum and now are mastec contractors. What are your thoughts and opinions on it so far?”r/CableTechs
Fluor vs Mastec: common questions
Which is better, Fluor or Mastec?
On our 0-100 score Fluor rates higher (64/100 against 8/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 13 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Fluor and Mastec compare on the numbers?
Fluor leads on our overall score (64/100 against 8/100), domain rating (72/100 against 63/100).
What do real users say about Fluor and Mastec?
Mastec: 0 positive and 2 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/CableTechs.
Read the full Fluor review and pricing or the Mastec review and pricing. You can also browse other Fluor alternatives we track.