FlowPayments vs Payhawk
FlowPayments vs Payhawk, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: FlowPayments is on 40/100 and Payhawk on 61/100.
Where each one leads
FlowPayments
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Payhawk
- our overall score: 61/100 against 40/100
- agent readiness: 55/100 against 40/100
- domain rating: 66/100 against 15/100
- funding raised: $81.0M against $30.0M
At a glance
| Measure | FlowPayments | Payhawk |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Streamlines payment processing and financial operations for businesses. | All-in-one spend management platform for businesses, simplifying expenses, cards, and payments. |
| Category | Fintech, Payments, Digital Payments, Embedded Finance | Fintech, Payments, Corporate Cards, Expense Management |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2021 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | London, United Kingdom |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | FlowPayments | Payhawk |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 459 |
| Total funding | $30.0M | $81.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | Bridge |
| Valuation | Not published | $575M |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 77,638 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | FlowPayments | Payhawk |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 40/100 | 61/100 |
| Traction | 37/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 10/100 | 29/100 |
| Quality | 40/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (40/100) | D (55/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 15/100 | 66/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | FlowPayments | Payhawk |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Google Cloud | Google Cloud |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Next.js, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Not detected |
FlowPayments vs Payhawk: common questions
Which is better, FlowPayments or Payhawk?
On our 0-100 score Payhawk rates higher (61/100 against 40/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do FlowPayments and Payhawk compare on the numbers?
Payhawk leads on our overall score (61/100 against 40/100), agent readiness (55/100 against 40/100), domain rating (66/100 against 15/100), funding raised ($81.0M against $30.0M).
Read the full FlowPayments review and pricing or the Payhawk review and pricing. You can also browse other FlowPayments alternatives we track.