#floQast vs Numeric
#floQast vs Numeric, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: #floQast is on 67/100 and Numeric on 49/100.
Where each one leads
#floQast
- our overall score: 67/100 against 49/100
- headcount: 862 against 117
- funding raised: $303M against $51.0M
- LinkedIn following: 35,123 against 12,525
Numeric
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | #floQast | Numeric |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cloud-based financial close management software that automates accounting processes using AI. | Numeric is an AI accounting automation platform, built to take manual work off accountants' plates so they can focus on what’s impactful. |
| Category | Accounting Automation, Accounting Software, Financial Close Management, Workflow Automation | Accounting Automation, Accounting Software, Fintech, Workflow Automation |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2013 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | Los Angeles, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | #floQast | Numeric |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 862 | 117 |
| Total funding | $303M | $51.0M |
| Latest round | Series E | Series B |
| Valuation | $1.6B | $400 |
| LinkedIn followers | 35,123 | 12,525 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | #floQast | Numeric |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 67/100 | 49/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 59/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 30/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (40/100) | F (38/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 72/100 | 67/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | #floQast | Numeric |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Webflow | Webflow |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Segment | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager |
Product and pricing
| Measure | #floQast | Numeric |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Not published | AI-powered Close Automation, Smart Subledgers, Reporting & Analytics, Technical Accounting AI, Full Transaction Drill-downs, Enterprise Ready & Secure |
#floQast vs Numeric: common questions
Which is better, #floQast or Numeric?
On our 0-100 score #floQast rates higher (67/100 against 49/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do #floQast and Numeric compare on the numbers?
#floQast leads on our overall score (67/100 against 49/100), headcount (862 against 117), funding raised ($303M against $51.0M), LinkedIn following (35,123 against 12,525).
Read the full #floQast review and pricing or the Numeric review and pricing. You can also browse other #floQast alternatives we track.