Floodlight vs Parker
Floodlight vs Parker, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Floodlight is on 54/100 and Parker on 53/100.
Where each one leads
Floodlight
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Parker
- headcount: 20 against 7
- funding raised: $45.0M against $6.4M
At a glance
| Measure | Floodlight | Parker |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Reinventing the finance experience for modern businesses, empowering founders to focus on growth. | Corporate credit cards and banking services for businesses. |
| Category | Fintech, E-commerce, Finance, Embedded Finance | Fintech, Financial Services, Corporate Spend Management, Payments |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2021 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Floodlight | Parker |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 7 | 20 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -23.3% | Not published |
| Total funding | $6.4M | $45.0M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series B |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | 1,099 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Floodlight | Parker |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 54/100 | 53/100 |
| Traction | 43/100 | 51/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 30/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 34/100 | 15/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 15/100 | Not published |
Floodlight vs Parker: common questions
Which is better, Floodlight or Parker?
On our 0-100 score Floodlight rates higher (54/100 against 53/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Floodlight and Parker compare on the numbers?
Parker leads on headcount (20 against 7), funding raised ($45.0M against $6.4M).
Read the full Floodlight review and pricing or the Parker review and pricing. You can also browse other Floodlight alternatives we track.