Five Sigma vs Planck
Five Sigma vs Planck, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Five Sigma is on 50/100 and Planck on 65/100.
Where each one leads
Five Sigma
- headcount growth: +13.3% against -7.5%
Planck
- our overall score: 65/100 against 50/100
- domain rating: 45/100 against 34/100
- headcount: 75 against 41
- funding raised: $71.0M against $12.0M
- LinkedIn following: 6,433 against 4,448
At a glance
| Measure | Five Sigma | Planck |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Innovative Claims Management System software for insurance carriers, MGAs, and TPAs. | Commercial insurance data platform enabling instant and accurate business underwriting. |
| Category | Fintech, Insurance, Management, Claims | Fintech, Insurance, Underwriting, InsurTech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2016 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Five Sigma | Planck |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 41 | 75 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +13.3% | -7.5% |
| Total funding | $12.0M | $71.0M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series D |
| Valuation | Not published | $250M |
| LinkedIn followers | 4,448 | 6,433 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Five Sigma | Planck |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 50/100 | 65/100 |
| Traction | 52/100 | 58/100 |
| Team | 10/100 | 90/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (45/100) | D (44/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 34/100 | 45/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Five Sigma | Planck |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Framer |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Five Sigma vs Planck: common questions
Which is better, Five Sigma or Planck?
On our 0-100 score Planck rates higher (65/100 against 50/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Five Sigma and Planck compare on the numbers?
Five Sigma leads on headcount growth (+13.3% against -7.5%). Planck leads on our overall score (65/100 against 50/100), domain rating (45/100 against 34/100), headcount (75 against 41), funding raised ($71.0M against $12.0M), LinkedIn following (6,433 against 4,448).
Read the full Five Sigma review and pricing or the Planck review and pricing. You can also browse other Five Sigma alternatives we track.