Fitscanner vs Runna
Fitscanner vs Runna, compared side by side on 13 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Fitscanner is on 50/100 and Runna on 59/100.
Where each one leads
Fitscanner
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Runna
- our overall score: 59/100 against 50/100
- agent readiness: 42/100 against 22/100
- domain rating: 71/100 against 2/100
- headcount: 248 against 3
At a glance
| Measure | Fitscanner | Runna |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A mobile app that uses photos to estimate body fat percentage and provide fitness insights. | A running training platform that offers personalized workouts and advice, adapting plans for various conditions like hot weather. |
| Category | Fitness, Body Scanner, HealthTech, Fitness Tech | Fitness, Health, Wearable Technology, Running App |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2C |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2016 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | Not published | London, United Kingdom |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Fitscanner | Runna |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 3 | 248 |
| Total funding | Not published | $6.9M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series A |
| Valuation | $1.5B | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 67,586 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Fitscanner | Runna |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 50/100 | 59/100 |
| Traction | 46/100 | 54/100 |
| Team | Not published | 50/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 2/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (22/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 2/100 | 71/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Fitscanner | Runna |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
What users say
| Measure | Fitscanner | Runna |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 0 positive, 3 negative across 6 threads |
“My own experience with it felt pretty middle-of-the-road, though I think the marketing hypes it up as a lot more than what it is. It has its strong points and I can see why some people love it, but I feel like it b”r/running
Fitscanner vs Runna: common questions
Which is better, Fitscanner or Runna?
On our 0-100 score Runna rates higher (59/100 against 50/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 13 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Fitscanner and Runna compare on the numbers?
Runna leads on our overall score (59/100 against 50/100), agent readiness (42/100 against 22/100), domain rating (71/100 against 2/100), headcount (248 against 3).
What do real users say about Fitscanner and Runna?
Runna: 0 positive and 3 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/running.
Read the full Fitscanner review and pricing or the Runna review and pricing. You can also browse other Fitscanner alternatives we track.