Fitscanner vs Lifebeam Vi
Fitscanner vs Lifebeam Vi, compared side by side on 12 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Fitscanner is on 50/100 and Lifebeam Vi on 53/100.
Where each one leads
Fitscanner
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Lifebeam Vi
- our overall score: 53/100 against 50/100
- agent readiness: 39/100 against 22/100
- domain rating: 41/100 against 2/100
- headcount: 193 against 3
At a glance
| Measure | Fitscanner | Lifebeam Vi |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A mobile app that uses photos to estimate body fat percentage and provide fitness insights. | Vi-Labs provides enterprise AI for health, supercharging digital health companies with engagement, retention, and LTV solutions. |
| Category | Fitness, Body Scanner, HealthTech, Fitness Tech | Fitness, Wearable, HealthTech, MedTech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2C |
| Offering | Software | Software, Hardware |
| Founded | 2016 | 2011 |
| Headquarters | Not published | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Fitscanner | Lifebeam Vi |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 3 | 193 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +67.4% |
| Total funding | Not published | $38.7M |
| Valuation | $1.5B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 13,264 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Fitscanner | Lifebeam Vi |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 50/100 | 53/100 |
| Traction | 46/100 | 58/100 |
| Team | Not published | 40/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 2/100 | 29/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (22/100) | F (39/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 2/100 | 41/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Fitscanner | Lifebeam Vi |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
What users say
| Measure | Fitscanner | Lifebeam Vi |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 2 positive, 0 negative across 2 threads |
“Lifebeam Vi Wraps Kickstarter As The Most Well-Funded Fitness Wearable Ever.”r/wearables
Fitscanner vs Lifebeam Vi: common questions
Which is better, Fitscanner or Lifebeam Vi?
On our 0-100 score Lifebeam Vi rates higher (53/100 against 50/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 12 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Fitscanner and Lifebeam Vi compare on the numbers?
Lifebeam Vi leads on our overall score (53/100 against 50/100), agent readiness (39/100 against 22/100), domain rating (41/100 against 2/100), headcount (193 against 3).
What do real users say about Fitscanner and Lifebeam Vi?
Lifebeam Vi: 2 positive and 0 negative mentions across 2 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/wearables.
Read the full Fitscanner review and pricing or the Lifebeam Vi review and pricing. You can also browse other Fitscanner alternatives we track.