Fit3d vs Lifebeam Vi
Fit3d vs Lifebeam Vi, compared side by side on 10 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Fit3d is on 29/100 and Lifebeam Vi on 53/100.
Where each one leads
Fit3d
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Lifebeam Vi
- our overall score: 53/100 against 29/100
At a glance
| Measure | Fit3d | Lifebeam Vi |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Fit3D provides a 3D body scanning and analysis platform for health, fitness, and wellness. | Vi-Labs provides enterprise AI for health, supercharging digital health companies with engagement, retention, and LTV solutions. |
| Category | HealthTech, Fitness Tech, Wellness Tech, 3D Scanning | Fitness, Wearable, HealthTech, MedTech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C |
| Offering | Hardware | Software, Hardware |
| Founded | Not published | 2011 |
| Headquarters | Not published | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Fit3d | Lifebeam Vi |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 193 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +67.4% |
| Total funding | Not published | $38.7M |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 13,264 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Fit3d | Lifebeam Vi |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 29/100 | 53/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 58/100 |
| Team | Not published | 40/100 |
| Search visibility | 15/100 | 29/100 |
| Quality | 45/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (37/100) | F (39/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | Not published | 41/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Fit3d | Lifebeam Vi |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
What users say
| Measure | Fit3d | Lifebeam Vi |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 0 positive, 5 negative across 6 threads | 2 positive, 0 negative across 2 threads |
“[CLASS ACTION ALERT] Did Fit3D promise you a "100% Free" service tier only to force you into a $100/mo mandatory subscription? We bought the ProScanner after being explicitly guaranteed a "100% Free" Basic service tier for unlimited scannin”r/Fit3DRefund
“Lifebeam Vi Wraps Kickstarter As The Most Well-Funded Fitness Wearable Ever.”r/wearables
Fit3d vs Lifebeam Vi: common questions
Which is better, Fit3d or Lifebeam Vi?
On our 0-100 score Lifebeam Vi rates higher (53/100 against 29/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 10 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Fit3d and Lifebeam Vi compare on the numbers?
Lifebeam Vi leads on our overall score (53/100 against 29/100).
What do real users say about Fit3d and Lifebeam Vi?
Fit3d: 0 positive and 5 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/Fit3DRefund. Lifebeam Vi: 2 positive and 0 negative mentions across 2 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/wearables.
Read the full Fit3d review and pricing or the Lifebeam Vi review and pricing. You can also browse other Fit3d alternatives we track.