Fish Audio vs Krisp
Fish Audio vs Krisp, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Fish Audio is on 59/100 and Krisp on 67/100.
Where each one leads
Fish Audio
- funding raised: $52.0M against $19.0M
Krisp
- our overall score: 67/100 against 59/100
- agent readiness: 63/100 against 51/100
- domain rating: 79/100 against 68/100
- headcount: 340 against 41
- LinkedIn following: 43,088 against 1,330
At a glance
| Measure | Fish Audio | Krisp |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Fish Audio builds AI voice models for both creative use cases and enterprise applications, offering expressive and steerable AI voices. | Krisp maximizes productivity in digital voice conversations with AI-powered noise cancellation, accent conversion, and meeting assistance. |
| Category | Artificial Intelligence, Voice Technology, Voice AI, Voice Agent | AI & Models, Speech Recognition, Speech-to-Text, Text-to-Speech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B, B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2025 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Palo Alto, United States | Berkeley, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Fish Audio | Krisp |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 41 | 340 |
| Total funding | $52.0M | $19.0M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series A |
| Valuation | $500M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 1,330 | 43,088 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Fish Audio | Krisp |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 59/100 | 67/100 |
| Traction | 55/100 | 56/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 10/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 63/100 | 65/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 76/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (51/100) | C (63/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 68/100 | 79/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Fish Audio | Krisp |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Google Tag Manager, Amplitude |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Fish Audio | Krisp |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Not published | AI Noise Cancellation, AI Accent Conversion, AI Meeting Assistant, Meeting Transcription, AI Live Interpreter, AI Agent Assist |
What users say
| Measure | Fish Audio | Krisp |
|---|---|---|
| Community ratingVisitor votes on StartupHub | 4.0/5 from 1 vote | Not published |
Fish Audio vs Krisp: common questions
Which is better, Fish Audio or Krisp?
On our 0-100 score Krisp rates higher (67/100 against 59/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Fish Audio and Krisp compare on the numbers?
Fish Audio leads on funding raised ($52.0M against $19.0M). Krisp leads on our overall score (67/100 against 59/100), agent readiness (63/100 against 51/100), domain rating (79/100 against 68/100), headcount (340 against 41), LinkedIn following (43,088 against 1,330).
Read the full Fish Audio review and pricing or the Krisp review and pricing. You can also browse other Fish Audio alternatives we track.