FIS vs Stoa
FIS vs Stoa, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: FIS is on 69/100 and Stoa on 42/100.
Where each one leads
FIS
- our overall score: 69/100 against 42/100
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 25/100
- funding raised: $11B against $2.4M
Stoa
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | FIS | Stoa |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Global leader in financial technology providing solutions for payments, banking, and capital markets. | Cash management platform enabling consumers and businesses to access upfront rewards on cash deposits. |
| Category | Fintech, Payments, Banking Technology, Capital Markets | Fintech, Financial Services, Consumer Finance, Business Finance |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B2C |
| Offering | Software | services | platform | Platform |
| Founded | 1968 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | Jacksonville, United States | London, United Kingdom |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | FIS | Stoa |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 3 |
| Total funding | $11B | $2.4M |
| Latest round | Series 16 | Pre-Seed |
| Valuation | $33B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 5 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | FIS | Stoa |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 69/100 | 42/100 |
| Traction | 40/100 | 38/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 34/100 | 17/100 |
| Quality | 89/100 | 45/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | F (25/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 83/100 | Not published |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | FIS | Stoa |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Azure | Vultr |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Tailwind CSS |
FIS vs Stoa: common questions
Which is better, FIS or Stoa?
On our 0-100 score FIS rates higher (69/100 against 42/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do FIS and Stoa compare on the numbers?
FIS leads on our overall score (69/100 against 42/100), agent readiness (47/100 against 25/100), funding raised ($11B against $2.4M).
Read the full FIS review and pricing or the Stoa review and pricing. You can also browse other FIS alternatives we track.