FIS vs SS&C Technologies
FIS vs SS&C Technologies, compared side by side on 13 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: FIS is on 69/100 and SS&C Technologies on 27/100.
Where each one leads
FIS
- our overall score: 69/100 against 27/100
- domain rating: 83/100 against 73/100
SS&C Technologies
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | FIS | SS&C Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Global leader in financial technology providing solutions for payments, banking, and capital markets. | Global financial services software and services provider for investment management. |
| Category | Fintech, Payments, Banking Technology, Capital Markets | Automation & RPA, Fintech, Enterprise Software, Financial Services |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | services | platform | Software | services | platform |
| Founded | 1968 | 1986 |
| Headquarters | Jacksonville, United States | Windsor, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | FIS | SS&C Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 26,804 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +17.6% |
| Total funding | $11B | Not published |
| Latest round | Series 16 | Not published |
| Valuation | $33B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 406,833 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | FIS | SS&C Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 69/100 | 27/100 |
| Traction | 40/100 | 20/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 10/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 34/100 | 37/100 |
| Quality | 89/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | D (50/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 83/100 | 73/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | FIS | SS&C Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Azure | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
FIS vs SS&C Technologies: common questions
Which is better, FIS or SS&C Technologies?
On our 0-100 score FIS rates higher (69/100 against 27/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 13 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do FIS and SS&C Technologies compare on the numbers?
FIS leads on our overall score (69/100 against 27/100), domain rating (83/100 against 73/100).
Read the full FIS review and pricing or the SS&C Technologies review and pricing. You can also browse other FIS alternatives we track.