FIS vs Sequence
FIS vs Sequence, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: FIS is on 69/100 and Sequence on 56/100.
Where each one leads
FIS
- our overall score: 69/100 against 56/100
- domain rating: 83/100 against 34/100
- funding raised: $11B against $15.0M
Sequence
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | FIS | Sequence |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Global leader in financial technology providing solutions for payments, banking, and capital markets. | Financial router platform to visualize, control, and automate money flow. |
| Category | Fintech, Payments, Banking Technology, Capital Markets | Fintech, Enterprise, Payments, Embedded Finance |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | services | platform | Software |
| Founded | 1968 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Jacksonville, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | FIS | Sequence |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 28 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +23.4% |
| Total funding | $11B | $15.0M |
| Latest round | Series 16 | Series A |
| Valuation | $33B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 2,752 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | FIS | Sequence |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 69/100 | 56/100 |
| Traction | 40/100 | 51/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 34/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | 89/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | D (44/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 83/100 | 34/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | FIS | Sequence |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Azure | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager, Mixpanel, Segment |
FIS vs Sequence: common questions
Which is better, FIS or Sequence?
On our 0-100 score FIS rates higher (69/100 against 56/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do FIS and Sequence compare on the numbers?
FIS leads on our overall score (69/100 against 56/100), domain rating (83/100 against 34/100), funding raised ($11B against $15.0M).
Read the full FIS review and pricing or the Sequence review and pricing. You can also browse other FIS alternatives we track.