FIS vs Pay.com
FIS vs Pay.com, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: FIS is on 69/100 and Pay.com on 55/100.
Where each one leads
FIS
- our overall score: 69/100 against 55/100
- domain rating: 83/100 against 61/100
- funding raised: $11B against $128M
Pay.com
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | FIS | Pay.com |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Global leader in financial technology providing solutions for payments, banking, and capital markets. | All-inclusive payment platform for businesses of all sizes, from micro-merchants to large enterprises. |
| Category | Fintech, Payments, Banking Technology, Capital Markets | Fintech, Payments, Digital Payments, Embedded Finance |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | services | platform | Platform |
| Founded | 1968 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Jacksonville, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | FIS | Pay.com |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 85 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +14.4% |
| Total funding | $11B | $128M |
| Latest round | Series 16 | Credit Facility |
| Valuation | $33B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 5,947 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | FIS | Pay.com |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 69/100 | 55/100 |
| Traction | 40/100 | 59/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 34/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | 89/100 | 55/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 83/100 | 61/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | FIS | Pay.com |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Azure | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | Zendesk |
FIS vs Pay.com: common questions
Which is better, FIS or Pay.com?
On our 0-100 score FIS rates higher (69/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do FIS and Pay.com compare on the numbers?
FIS leads on our overall score (69/100 against 55/100), domain rating (83/100 against 61/100), funding raised ($11B against $128M).
Read the full FIS review and pricing or the Pay.com review and pricing. You can also browse other FIS alternatives we track.