FIS vs OnTab
FIS vs OnTab, compared side by side on 14 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: FIS is on 69/100 and OnTab on 27/100.
Where each one leads
FIS
- our overall score: 69/100 against 27/100
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 22/100
- domain rating: 83/100 against 22/100
OnTab
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | FIS | OnTab |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Global leader in financial technology providing solutions for payments, banking, and capital markets. | Payment technology company specializing in EMV certifications, secure programming, and payment enablement for merchants. |
| Category | Fintech, Payments, Banking Technology, Capital Markets | Fintech, Payments, EMV Certification, PCI Compliance |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | services | platform | Services |
| Founded | 1968 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Jacksonville, United States | Toronto, Canada |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | FIS | OnTab |
|---|---|---|
| Total funding | $11B | Not published |
| Latest round | Series 16 | Not published |
| Valuation | $33B | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | FIS | OnTab |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 69/100 | 27/100 |
| Traction | 40/100 | 30/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 30/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 34/100 | 3/100 |
| Quality | 89/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | F (22/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 83/100 | 22/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | FIS | OnTab |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Azure | AWS |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar |
FIS vs OnTab: common questions
Which is better, FIS or OnTab?
On our 0-100 score FIS rates higher (69/100 against 27/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 14 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do FIS and OnTab compare on the numbers?
FIS leads on our overall score (69/100 against 27/100), agent readiness (47/100 against 22/100), domain rating (83/100 against 22/100).
Read the full FIS review and pricing or the OnTab review and pricing. You can also browse other FIS alternatives we track.