FIS vs Hoox
FIS vs Hoox, compared side by side on 14 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: FIS is on 69/100 and Hoox on 37/100.
Where each one leads
FIS
- our overall score: 69/100 against 37/100
- domain rating: 83/100 against 44/100
Hoox
- agent readiness: 66/100 against 47/100
At a glance
| Measure | FIS | Hoox |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Global leader in financial technology providing solutions for payments, banking, and capital markets. | Customer activation platform for financial services to increase customer engagement and loyalty. |
| Category | Fintech, Payments, Banking Technology, Capital Markets | Fintech, Payments, Embedded Finance, Customer Engagement |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | services | platform | Software |
| Founded | 1968 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Jacksonville, United States | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | FIS | Hoox |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 7 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +29.1% |
| Total funding | $11B | Not published |
| Latest round | Series 16 | Not published |
| Valuation | $33B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 1,384 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | FIS | Hoox |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 69/100 | 37/100 |
| Traction | 40/100 | 9/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 34/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 89/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | C (66/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 83/100 | 44/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | FIS | Hoox |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Azure | Render |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
FIS vs Hoox: common questions
Which is better, FIS or Hoox?
On our 0-100 score FIS rates higher (69/100 against 37/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 14 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do FIS and Hoox compare on the numbers?
FIS leads on our overall score (69/100 against 37/100), domain rating (83/100 against 44/100). Hoox leads on agent readiness (66/100 against 47/100).
Read the full FIS review and pricing or the Hoox review and pricing. You can also browse other FIS alternatives we track.