First Page Sage vs Hearst
First Page Sage vs Hearst, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: First Page Sage is on 36/100 and Hearst on 25/100.
Where each one leads
First Page Sage
- our overall score: 36/100 against 25/100
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 24/100
Hearst
- headcount: 6,117 against 60
- headcount growth: +62.1% against +17.0%
- LinkedIn following: 182,087 against 2,451
At a glance
| Measure | First Page Sage | Hearst |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | An SEO and Generative AI Optimization agency for enterprise brands focused on data-driven growth. | Multinational conglomerate with diverse media, financial services, and software interests. |
| Category | Agentic SEO, SEO Consulting, Content Marketing, Lead Generation | Media, Publishing, Television, Financial Services |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Services | Platform |
| Founded | 2009 | 1887 |
| Headquarters | Salt Lake City, United States | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | First Page Sage | Hearst |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 60 | 6,117 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +17.0% | +62.1% |
| LinkedIn followers | 2,451 | 182,087 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | First Page Sage | Hearst |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 36/100 | 25/100 |
| Traction | 18/100 | 20/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 22/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | F (24/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 82/100 | 78/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | First Page Sage | Hearst |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4 |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
What users say
| Measure | First Page Sage | Hearst |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 1 positive, 0 negative across 6 threads |
“Ed Sheeran for the January/February 2026 issue of Men’s Health US/UK; Photography by Patrik Giardino/Hearst Owned.”r/popculturechat
First Page Sage vs Hearst: common questions
Which is better, First Page Sage or Hearst?
On our 0-100 score First Page Sage rates higher (36/100 against 25/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do First Page Sage and Hearst compare on the numbers?
First Page Sage leads on our overall score (36/100 against 25/100), agent readiness (47/100 against 24/100). Hearst leads on headcount (6,117 against 60), headcount growth (+62.1% against +17.0%), LinkedIn following (182,087 against 2,451).
What do real users say about First Page Sage and Hearst?
Hearst: 1 positive and 0 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/popculturechat.
Read the full First Page Sage review and pricing or the Hearst review and pricing. You can also browse other First Page Sage alternatives we track.