Firewave vs SupPlant
Firewave vs SupPlant, compared side by side on 14 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Firewave is on 18/100 and SupPlant on 66/100.
Where each one leads
Firewave
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
SupPlant
- our overall score: 66/100 against 18/100
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 38/100
- domain rating: 38/100 against 12/100
- headcount: 55 against 5
- LinkedIn following: 15,340 against 402
At a glance
| Measure | Firewave | SupPlant |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Uses acoustic fire detection for early wildfire detection and response. | Agritech company providing AI-driven irrigation solutions for water-stressed agriculture, optimizing crop yields and conserving water. |
| Category | Environmental Monitoring, IoT, Wildfire Management, Climate Tech | AgTech, Precision Agriculture, Water Management, Crop Optimization |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2022 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Afula, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Firewave | SupPlant |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 5 | 55 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -13.4% |
| Total funding | Not published | $52.9M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series C |
| Valuation | Not published | $30.0M |
| LinkedIn followers | 402 | 15,340 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Firewave | SupPlant |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 18/100 | 66/100 |
| Traction | 8/100 | 56/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 30/100 | 30/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 75/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (38/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 12/100 | 38/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Firewave | SupPlant |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Wix | Not detected |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
Firewave vs SupPlant: common questions
Which is better, Firewave or SupPlant?
On our 0-100 score SupPlant rates higher (66/100 against 18/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 14 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Firewave and SupPlant compare on the numbers?
SupPlant leads on our overall score (66/100 against 18/100), agent readiness (47/100 against 38/100), domain rating (38/100 against 12/100), headcount (55 against 5), LinkedIn following (15,340 against 402).
Read the full Firewave review and pricing or the SupPlant review and pricing. You can also browse other Firewave alternatives we track.