FireCompass vs Intruder
FireCompass vs Intruder, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: FireCompass is on 39/100 and Intruder on 60/100.
Where each one leads
FireCompass
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Intruder
- our overall score: 60/100 against 39/100
- domain rating: 73/100 against 46/100
- funding raised: $63.0M against $27.0M
At a glance
| Measure | FireCompass | Intruder |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered attack surface management and digital risk protection platform. | Attack surface management company. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Attack Surface Management, Digital Risk Protection, Threat Detection | Cybersecurity, Attack Surface Management, Vulnerability Management, Penetration Testing |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2019 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | London, United Kingdom |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | FireCompass | Intruder |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 84 |
| Total funding | $27.0M | $63.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series B |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 5,752 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | FireCompass | Intruder |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 39/100 | 60/100 |
| Traction | 38/100 | 58/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | Not published |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | Not published | 49/100 |
| Quality | 40/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (42/100) | D (44/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 46/100 | 73/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | FireCompass | Intruder |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager | PostHog, Plausible |
| Support stack | Not detected | Intercom |
| Open source | No | Yes |
FireCompass vs Intruder: common questions
Which is better, FireCompass or Intruder?
On our 0-100 score Intruder rates higher (60/100 against 39/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do FireCompass and Intruder compare on the numbers?
Intruder leads on our overall score (60/100 against 39/100), domain rating (73/100 against 46/100), funding raised ($63.0M against $27.0M).
Read the full FireCompass review and pricing or the Intruder review and pricing. You can also browse other FireCompass alternatives we track.