Fireblocks vs ZeroHash
Fireblocks vs ZeroHash, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Fireblocks is on 74/100 and ZeroHash on 49/100.
Where each one leads
Fireblocks
- our overall score: 74/100 against 49/100
- domain rating: 76/100 against 57/100
- headcount: 663 against 231
- funding raised: $1.0B against $255M
- LinkedIn following: 60,117 against 25,227
ZeroHash
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Fireblocks | ZeroHash |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Enterprise digital asset infrastructure platform enabling banks, exchanges, and fintechs to securely custody, transfer, tokenize, and settle digital assets at institutional scale. | Provides embedded crypto infrastructure for fintechs and marketplaces to offer digital asset services. |
| Category | Blockchain, Digital Assets, Fintech, Crypto Infrastructure | Fintech, Payments, Digital Payments, Embedded Finance |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2018 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | New York City, United States | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Fireblocks | ZeroHash |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 663 | 231 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +17.9% | Not published |
| Total funding | $1.0B | $255M |
| Latest round | Series E | Not published |
| Valuation | $8.0B | $400 |
| LinkedIn followers | 60,117 | 25,227 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Fireblocks | ZeroHash |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 74/100 | 49/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 51/100 | 20/100 |
| Quality | 86/100 | 45/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (53/100) | D (48/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 76/100 | 57/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Fireblocks | ZeroHash |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Webflow |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
Fireblocks vs ZeroHash: common questions
Which is better, Fireblocks or ZeroHash?
On our 0-100 score Fireblocks rates higher (74/100 against 49/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Fireblocks and ZeroHash compare on the numbers?
Fireblocks leads on our overall score (74/100 against 49/100), domain rating (76/100 against 57/100), headcount (663 against 231), funding raised ($1.0B against $255M), LinkedIn following (60,117 against 25,227).
Read the full Fireblocks review and pricing or the ZeroHash review and pricing. You can also browse other Fireblocks alternatives we track.