Fireblocks vs Zero Hash
Fireblocks vs Zero Hash, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Fireblocks is on 74/100 and Zero Hash on 50/100.
Where each one leads
Fireblocks
- our overall score: 74/100 against 50/100
- domain rating: 76/100 against 56/100
- headcount: 663 against 231
- funding raised: $1.0B against $254M
- LinkedIn following: 60,117 against 25,227
Zero Hash
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Fireblocks | Zero Hash |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Enterprise digital asset infrastructure platform enabling banks, exchanges, and fintechs to securely custody, transfer, tokenize, and settle digital assets at institutional scale. | Digital asset custody and compliance platform for regulated financial institutions. |
| Category | Blockchain, Digital Assets, Fintech, Crypto Infrastructure | Fintech, Digital Payments, Embedded Finance, Web3 |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2018 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | New York City, United States | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Fireblocks | Zero Hash |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 663 | 231 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +17.9% | Not published |
| Total funding | $1.0B | $254M |
| Latest round | Series E | Not published |
| Valuation | $8.0B | $1 |
| LinkedIn followers | 60,117 | 25,227 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Fireblocks | Zero Hash |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 74/100 | 50/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | Not published |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 51/100 | 6/100 |
| Quality | 86/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (53/100) | D (48/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 76/100 | 56/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Fireblocks | Zero Hash |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Webflow |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
Fireblocks vs Zero Hash: common questions
Which is better, Fireblocks or Zero Hash?
On our 0-100 score Fireblocks rates higher (74/100 against 50/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Fireblocks and Zero Hash compare on the numbers?
Fireblocks leads on our overall score (74/100 against 50/100), domain rating (76/100 against 56/100), headcount (663 against 231), funding raised ($1.0B against $254M), LinkedIn following (60,117 against 25,227).
Read the full Fireblocks review and pricing or the Zero Hash review and pricing. You can also browse other Fireblocks alternatives we track.