Fireblocks vs Utila
Fireblocks vs Utila, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Fireblocks is on 74/100 and Utila on 60/100.
Where each one leads
Fireblocks
- our overall score: 74/100 against 60/100
- domain rating: 76/100 against 51/100
- headcount: 663 against 85
- funding raised: $1.0B against $51.5M
- LinkedIn following: 60,117 against 10,677
Utila
- headcount growth: +64.7% against +17.9%
At a glance
| Measure | Fireblocks | Utila |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Enterprise digital asset infrastructure platform enabling banks, exchanges, and fintechs to securely custody, transfer, tokenize, and settle digital assets at institutional scale. | Self-custody wallet platform and API for secure digital asset management and custom offerings. |
| Category | Blockchain, Digital Assets, Fintech, Crypto Infrastructure | Digital Assets, Wallet, Crypto, Fintech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B, B2C |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2018 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | New York City, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Fireblocks | Utila |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 663 | 85 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +17.9% | +64.7% |
| Total funding | $1.0B | $51.5M |
| Latest round | Series E | Series A1 |
| Valuation | $8.0B | $180M |
| LinkedIn followers | 60,117 | 10,677 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Fireblocks | Utila |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 74/100 | 60/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 58/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 51/100 | 40/100 |
| Quality | 86/100 | 62/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (53/100) | D (50/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 76/100 | 51/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Fireblocks | Utila |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Framer |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
Fireblocks vs Utila: common questions
Which is better, Fireblocks or Utila?
On our 0-100 score Fireblocks rates higher (74/100 against 60/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Fireblocks and Utila compare on the numbers?
Fireblocks leads on our overall score (74/100 against 60/100), domain rating (76/100 against 51/100), headcount (663 against 85), funding raised ($1.0B against $51.5M), LinkedIn following (60,117 against 10,677). Utila leads on headcount growth (+64.7% against +17.9%).
Read the full Fireblocks review and pricing or the Utila review and pricing. You can also browse other Fireblocks alternatives we track.