Fireblocks vs Near
Fireblocks vs Near, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Fireblocks is on 74/100 and Near on 58/100.
Where each one leads
Fireblocks
- our overall score: 74/100 against 58/100
- agent readiness: 53/100 against 40/100
Near
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Fireblocks | Near |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Enterprise digital asset infrastructure platform enabling banks, exchanges, and fintechs to securely custody, transfer, tokenize, and settle digital assets at institutional scale. | Scalable blockchain platform for user-friendly decentralized applications. |
| Category | Blockchain, Digital Assets, Fintech, Crypto Infrastructure | Blockchain, DeFi, Web3, Developer Tools |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2018 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | New York City, United States | Zug, Switzerland |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Fireblocks | Near |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 663 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +17.9% | Not published |
| Total funding | $1.0B | $1.1B |
| Latest round | Series E | Other Equity |
| Valuation | $8.0B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 60,117 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Fireblocks | Near |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 74/100 | 58/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 40/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 51/100 | 14/100 |
| Quality | 86/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (53/100) | D (40/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 76/100 | 76/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Fireblocks | Near |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Vercel |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Vercel |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Fireblocks vs Near: common questions
Which is better, Fireblocks or Near?
On our 0-100 score Fireblocks rates higher (74/100 against 58/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Fireblocks and Near compare on the numbers?
Fireblocks leads on our overall score (74/100 against 58/100), agent readiness (53/100 against 40/100).
Read the full Fireblocks review and pricing or the Near review and pricing. You can also browse other Fireblocks alternatives we track.