Fireblocks vs Newton Labs
Fireblocks vs Newton Labs, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Fireblocks is on 74/100 and Newton Labs on 59/100.
Where each one leads
Fireblocks
- our overall score: 74/100 against 59/100
- agent readiness: 53/100 against 46/100
- domain rating: 76/100 against 46/100
- headcount: 663 against 8
- funding raised: $1.0B against $52.0M
- LinkedIn following: 60,117 against 156
Newton Labs
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Fireblocks | Newton Labs |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Enterprise digital asset infrastructure platform enabling banks, exchanges, and fintechs to securely custody, transfer, tokenize, and settle digital assets at institutional scale. | Newton Labs is building an authorization layer for onchain finance, enabling institutions and protocols to enforce compliance, identity, security, and risk policies before transactions settle. |
| Category | Blockchain, Digital Assets, Fintech, Crypto Infrastructure | Blockchain, Fintech, Web3, Cryptocurrency |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2018 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | New York City, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Fireblocks | Newton Labs |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 663 | 8 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +17.9% | Not published |
| Total funding | $1.0B | $52.0M |
| Latest round | Series E | Strategic |
| Valuation | $8.0B | $499M |
| LinkedIn followers | 60,117 | 156 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Fireblocks | Newton Labs |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 74/100 | 59/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 48/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 51/100 | 26/100 |
| Quality | 86/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (53/100) | D (46/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 76/100 | 46/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Fireblocks | Newton Labs |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Vercel |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
What users say
| Measure | Fireblocks | Newton Labs |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 0 positive, 1 negative across 3 threads |
“Magic Labs will discontinue support for Algorand wallets accessed through Email Login, Google, Apple, X (Twitter), Discord, and Twitch authentication on July 29, 2026 at 12:00 PM PT.. https://reveal.magic.link/algorand/exa-market”r/AlgorandOfficial
Fireblocks vs Newton Labs: common questions
Which is better, Fireblocks or Newton Labs?
On our 0-100 score Fireblocks rates higher (74/100 against 59/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Fireblocks and Newton Labs compare on the numbers?
Fireblocks leads on our overall score (74/100 against 59/100), agent readiness (53/100 against 46/100), domain rating (76/100 against 46/100), headcount (663 against 8), funding raised ($1.0B against $52.0M), LinkedIn following (60,117 against 156).
What do real users say about Fireblocks and Newton Labs?
Newton Labs: 0 positive and 1 negative mentions across 3 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/AlgorandOfficial.
Read the full Fireblocks review and pricing or the Newton Labs review and pricing. You can also browse other Fireblocks alternatives we track.