Fireblocks vs Hashdex
Fireblocks vs Hashdex, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Fireblocks is on 74/100 and Hashdex on 54/100.
Where each one leads
Fireblocks
- our overall score: 74/100 against 54/100
- agent readiness: 53/100 against 32/100
- domain rating: 76/100 against 49/100
- headcount: 663 against 87
- funding raised: $1.0B against $27.5M
- LinkedIn following: 60,117 against 23,589
Hashdex
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Fireblocks | Hashdex |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Enterprise digital asset infrastructure platform enabling banks, exchanges, and fintechs to securely custody, transfer, tokenize, and settle digital assets at institutional scale. | Hashdex is a global pioneer in crypto asset management, building pathways to prosperity by opening the crypto ecosystem to the world. |
| Category | Blockchain, Digital Assets, Fintech, Crypto Infrastructure | Asset Management, Fintech, Cryptocurrency/Blockchain, Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2018 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | New York City, United States | Rio de Janeiro, Brazil |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Fireblocks | Hashdex |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 663 | 87 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +17.9% | Not published |
| Total funding | $1.0B | $27.5M |
| Latest round | Series E | Series B |
| Valuation | $8.0B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 60,117 | 23,589 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Fireblocks | Hashdex |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 74/100 | 54/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 57/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 51/100 | 22/100 |
| Quality | 86/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (53/100) | F (32/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 76/100 | 49/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Fireblocks | Hashdex |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | CloudFront |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Nuxt, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
Fireblocks vs Hashdex: common questions
Which is better, Fireblocks or Hashdex?
On our 0-100 score Fireblocks rates higher (74/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Fireblocks and Hashdex compare on the numbers?
Fireblocks leads on our overall score (74/100 against 54/100), agent readiness (53/100 against 32/100), domain rating (76/100 against 49/100), headcount (663 against 87), funding raised ($1.0B against $27.5M), LinkedIn following (60,117 against 23,589).
Read the full Fireblocks review and pricing or the Hashdex review and pricing. You can also browse other Fireblocks alternatives we track.