FingerprintJS vs Twine Security
FingerprintJS vs Twine Security, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: FingerprintJS is on 61/100 and Twine Security on 55/100.
Where each one leads
FingerprintJS
- our overall score: 61/100 against 55/100
- domain rating: 73/100 against 39/100
- headcount: 251 against 32
- funding raised: $88.0M against $12.0M
- LinkedIn following: 33,861 against 11,498
Twine Security
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | FingerprintJS | Twine Security |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Device intelligence platform for fraud prevention, bot detection, and enhanced customer experiences. | AI-powered digital employees enhancing cybersecurity team efficiency and identity management. |
| Category | Customer Service, AI Agents, Cybersecurity, Fraud Detection | Cybersecurity, Identity & Access, Agentic AI, AI Agents |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | platform | Software |
| Founded | 2019 | 2024 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | FingerprintJS | Twine Security |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 251 | 32 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +58.3% | +57.0% |
| Total funding | $88.0M | $12.0M |
| Latest round | Series C | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 33,861 | 11,498 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | FingerprintJS | Twine Security |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 61/100 | 55/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 51/100 |
| Team | 24/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 81/100 | 49/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (44/100) | D (44/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 73/100 | 39/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | FingerprintJS | Twine Security |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Vercel | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Linkedin Insight |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
| Open source | Yes | No |
What users say
| Measure | FingerprintJS | Twine Security |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 2 positive, 0 negative across 4 threads | Not published |
“fingerprintjs. Identify visitors you can trust. And those you can’t. Over 6,000 companies trust Fingerprint’s highly accurate, real-time device intelligence.”r/
FingerprintJS vs Twine Security: common questions
Which is better, FingerprintJS or Twine Security?
On our 0-100 score FingerprintJS rates higher (61/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do FingerprintJS and Twine Security compare on the numbers?
FingerprintJS leads on our overall score (61/100 against 55/100), domain rating (73/100 against 39/100), headcount (251 against 32), funding raised ($88.0M against $12.0M), LinkedIn following (33,861 against 11,498).
What do real users say about FingerprintJS and Twine Security?
FingerprintJS: 2 positive and 0 negative mentions across 4 Reddit threads we track.
Read the full FingerprintJS review and pricing or the Twine Security review and pricing. You can also browse other FingerprintJS alternatives we track.