FingerprintJS vs Tars Technologies
FingerprintJS vs Tars Technologies, compared side by side on 14 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: FingerprintJS is on 61/100 and Tars Technologies on 20/100.
Where each one leads
FingerprintJS
- our overall score: 61/100 against 20/100
- agent readiness: 44/100 against 27/100
- headcount: 251 against 44
- LinkedIn following: 33,861 against 21,145
Tars Technologies
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | FingerprintJS | Tars Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Device intelligence platform for fraud prevention, bot detection, and enhanced customer experiences. | Tars Technologies provides conversion-focused chatbots for marketing, sales, and lead generation. |
| Category | Customer Service, AI Agents, Cybersecurity, Fraud Detection | Customer Service, AI Agents |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | Not published |
| Offering | Software | platform | Not published |
| Founded | 2019 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | New York, USA |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | FingerprintJS | Tars Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 251 | 44 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +58.3% | Not published |
| Total funding | $88.0M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series C | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 33,861 | 21,145 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | FingerprintJS | Tars Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 61/100 | 20/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 17/100 |
| Team | 24/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 81/100 | 35/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (44/100) | F (27/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 73/100 | 72/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | FingerprintJS | Tars Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Vercel |
| CDN | Vercel | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager, PostHog |
| Open source | Yes | No |
What users say
| Measure | FingerprintJS | Tars Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 2 positive, 0 negative across 4 threads | Not published |
“fingerprintjs. Identify visitors you can trust. And those you can’t. Over 6,000 companies trust Fingerprint’s highly accurate, real-time device intelligence.”r/
FingerprintJS vs Tars Technologies: common questions
Which is better, FingerprintJS or Tars Technologies?
On our 0-100 score FingerprintJS rates higher (61/100 against 20/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 14 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do FingerprintJS and Tars Technologies compare on the numbers?
FingerprintJS leads on our overall score (61/100 against 20/100), agent readiness (44/100 against 27/100), headcount (251 against 44), LinkedIn following (33,861 against 21,145).
What do real users say about FingerprintJS and Tars Technologies?
FingerprintJS: 2 positive and 0 negative mentions across 4 Reddit threads we track.
Read the full FingerprintJS review and pricing or the Tars Technologies review and pricing. You can also browse other FingerprintJS alternatives we track.