FingerprintJS vs Sift
FingerprintJS vs Sift, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: FingerprintJS is on 61/100 and Sift on 41/100.
Where each one leads
FingerprintJS
- our overall score: 61/100 against 41/100
- agent readiness: 44/100 against 21/100
- headcount: 251 against 2
- funding raised: $88.0M against $4.3M
- LinkedIn following: 33,861 against 17
Sift
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | FingerprintJS | Sift |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Device intelligence platform for fraud prevention, bot detection, and enhanced customer experiences. | Reduced Real-Time Bidding (RTB) infrastructure costs by filtering low-value impressions using machine learning. |
| Category | Customer Service, AI Agents, Cybersecurity, Fraud Detection | Marketing, Programmatic Media, Real-Time Bidding, MFG + SUPPLY CHAIN |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | platform | Software |
| Founded | 2019 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Not published |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | FingerprintJS | Sift |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 251 | 2 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +58.3% | Not published |
| Total funding | $88.0M | $4.3M |
| Latest round | Series C | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 33,861 | 17 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | FingerprintJS | Sift |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 61/100 | 41/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 38/100 |
| Team | 24/100 | 20/100 |
| Search visibility | 81/100 | 24/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 48/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (44/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 73/100 | Not published |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | FingerprintJS | Sift |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Vercel | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
What users say
| Measure | FingerprintJS | Sift |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 2 positive, 0 negative across 4 threads | Not published |
“fingerprintjs. Identify visitors you can trust. And those you can’t. Over 6,000 companies trust Fingerprint’s highly accurate, real-time device intelligence.”r/
FingerprintJS vs Sift: common questions
Which is better, FingerprintJS or Sift?
On our 0-100 score FingerprintJS rates higher (61/100 against 41/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do FingerprintJS and Sift compare on the numbers?
FingerprintJS leads on our overall score (61/100 against 41/100), agent readiness (44/100 against 21/100), headcount (251 against 2), funding raised ($88.0M against $4.3M), LinkedIn following (33,861 against 17).
What do real users say about FingerprintJS and Sift?
FingerprintJS: 2 positive and 0 negative mentions across 4 Reddit threads we track.
Read the full FingerprintJS review and pricing or the Sift review and pricing. You can also browse other FingerprintJS alternatives we track.