FingerprintJS vs Kata.ai
FingerprintJS vs Kata.ai, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: FingerprintJS is on 61/100 and Kata.ai on 55/100.
Where each one leads
FingerprintJS
- our overall score: 61/100 against 55/100
- domain rating: 73/100 against 48/100
- headcount: 251 against 88
- funding raised: $88.0M against $3.5M
Kata.ai
- LinkedIn following: 45,860 against 33,861
At a glance
| Measure | FingerprintJS | Kata.ai |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Device intelligence platform for fraud prevention, bot detection, and enhanced customer experiences. | Develops enterprise-grade chatbots and AI agents for customer interactions. |
| Category | Customer Service, AI Agents, Cybersecurity, Fraud Detection | Customer Service, AI Agents |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | platform | Software |
| Founded | 2019 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Jakarta, Indonesia |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | FingerprintJS | Kata.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 251 | 88 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +58.3% | Not published |
| Total funding | $88.0M | $3.5M |
| Latest round | Series C | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 33,861 | 45,860 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | FingerprintJS | Kata.ai |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 61/100 | 55/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 52/100 |
| Team | 24/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 81/100 | 31/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (44/100) | D (44/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 73/100 | 48/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | FingerprintJS | Kata.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Vercel | Not detected |
| CMS | Not detected | Framer |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4 |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
What users say
| Measure | FingerprintJS | Kata.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 2 positive, 0 negative across 4 threads | Not published |
“fingerprintjs. Identify visitors you can trust. And those you can’t. Over 6,000 companies trust Fingerprint’s highly accurate, real-time device intelligence.”r/
FingerprintJS vs Kata.ai: common questions
Which is better, FingerprintJS or Kata.ai?
On our 0-100 score FingerprintJS rates higher (61/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do FingerprintJS and Kata.ai compare on the numbers?
FingerprintJS leads on our overall score (61/100 against 55/100), domain rating (73/100 against 48/100), headcount (251 against 88), funding raised ($88.0M against $3.5M). Kata.ai leads on LinkedIn following (45,860 against 33,861).
What do real users say about FingerprintJS and Kata.ai?
FingerprintJS: 2 positive and 0 negative mentions across 4 Reddit threads we track.
Read the full FingerprintJS review and pricing or the Kata.ai review and pricing. You can also browse other FingerprintJS alternatives we track.