Finclude vs Pagaya Investments
Finclude vs Pagaya Investments, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Finclude is on 13/100 and Pagaya Investments on 65/100.
Where each one leads
Finclude
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Pagaya Investments
- our overall score: 65/100 against 13/100
- agent readiness: 55/100 against 39/100
- domain rating: 59/100 against 33/100
- headcount: 463 against 6
- headcount growth: -14.3% against -44.7%
- LinkedIn following: 70,861 against 4,044
At a glance
| Measure | Finclude | Pagaya Investments |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered credit scoring for individuals and businesses without traditional credit history. | AI-powered network enabling financial institutions to expand customer access and scale lending. |
| Category | Fintech, Lending, Embedded Finance, AI-Driven Parametric Insurance | Fintech, Asset Management, Fixed Income, Credit |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | platform | Software |
| Founded | 2018 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | Not published | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Finclude | Pagaya Investments |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 6 | 463 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -44.7% | -14.3% |
| Total funding | Not published | $1.4B |
| Latest round | Not published | Credit Facility |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.3B |
| LinkedIn followers | 4,044 | 70,861 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Finclude | Pagaya Investments |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 13/100 | 65/100 |
| Traction | 8/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 80/100 |
| Search visibility | 22/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (39/100) | D (55/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 33/100 | 59/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Finclude | Pagaya Investments |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Vercel |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Vercel |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
Finclude vs Pagaya Investments: common questions
Which is better, Finclude or Pagaya Investments?
On our 0-100 score Pagaya Investments rates higher (65/100 against 13/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Finclude and Pagaya Investments compare on the numbers?
Pagaya Investments leads on our overall score (65/100 against 13/100), agent readiness (55/100 against 39/100), domain rating (59/100 against 33/100), headcount (463 against 6), headcount growth (-14.3% against -44.7%), LinkedIn following (70,861 against 4,044).
Read the full Finclude review and pricing or the Pagaya Investments review and pricing. You can also browse other Finclude alternatives we track.