Finclude vs Liquidity Group
Finclude vs Liquidity Group, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Finclude is on 13/100 and Liquidity Group on 62/100.
Where each one leads
Finclude
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Liquidity Group
- our overall score: 62/100 against 13/100
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 39/100
- domain rating: 50/100 against 33/100
- headcount: 153 against 6
- headcount growth: +34.2% against -44.7%
- LinkedIn following: 31,623 against 4,044
At a glance
| Measure | Finclude | Liquidity Group |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered credit scoring for individuals and businesses without traditional credit history. | Global AI-powered financial asset management firm providing growth capital to tech companies. |
| Category | Fintech, Lending, Embedded Finance, AI-Driven Parametric Insurance | Fintech, Financing, Credit, Credit Lending |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | platform | Software |
| Founded | 2018 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | Not published | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Finclude | Liquidity Group |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 6 | 153 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -44.7% | +34.2% |
| Total funding | Not published | $986M |
| Latest round | Not published | Credit Facility |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.4B |
| LinkedIn followers | 4,044 | 31,623 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Finclude | Liquidity Group |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 13/100 | 62/100 |
| Traction | 8/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 22/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 65/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (39/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 33/100 | 50/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Finclude | Liquidity Group |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
Finclude vs Liquidity Group: common questions
Which is better, Finclude or Liquidity Group?
On our 0-100 score Liquidity Group rates higher (62/100 against 13/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Finclude and Liquidity Group compare on the numbers?
Liquidity Group leads on our overall score (62/100 against 13/100), agent readiness (47/100 against 39/100), domain rating (50/100 against 33/100), headcount (153 against 6), headcount growth (+34.2% against -44.7%), LinkedIn following (31,623 against 4,044).
Read the full Finclude review and pricing or the Liquidity Group review and pricing. You can also browse other Finclude alternatives we track.