FinBox vs Finclude
FinBox vs Finclude, compared side by side on 14 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: FinBox is on 62/100 and Finclude on 13/100.
Where each one leads
FinBox
- our overall score: 62/100 against 13/100
- agent readiness: 48/100 against 39/100
- domain rating: 49/100 against 33/100
- headcount: 395 against 6
- headcount growth: +75.8% against -44.7%
- LinkedIn following: 93,108 against 4,044
Finclude
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | FinBox | Finclude |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | B2B credit infrastructure fintech enabling digital platforms to launch and scale credit products. | AI-powered credit scoring for individuals and businesses without traditional credit history. |
| Category | Fintech, Embedded Finance, Lending, Credit Infrastructure | Fintech, Lending, Embedded Finance, AI-Driven Parametric Insurance |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software | platform |
| Founded | 2015 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Bengaluru, India | Not published |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | FinBox | Finclude |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 395 | 6 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +75.8% | -44.7% |
| Total funding | $55.0M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 93,108 | 4,044 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | FinBox | Finclude |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 62/100 | 13/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 8/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 23/100 | 22/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | F (39/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 49/100 | 33/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | FinBox | Finclude |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Framer | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, PostHog, Linkedin Insight | Not detected |
FinBox vs Finclude: common questions
Which is better, FinBox or Finclude?
On our 0-100 score FinBox rates higher (62/100 against 13/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 14 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do FinBox and Finclude compare on the numbers?
FinBox leads on our overall score (62/100 against 13/100), agent readiness (48/100 against 39/100), domain rating (49/100 against 33/100), headcount (395 against 6), headcount growth (+75.8% against -44.7%), LinkedIn following (93,108 against 4,044).
Read the full FinBox review and pricing or the Finclude review and pricing. You can also browse other FinBox alternatives we track.