Final vs Finclude
Final vs Finclude, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Final is on 67/100 and Finclude on 13/100.
Where each one leads
Final
- our overall score: 67/100 against 13/100
- headcount: 341 against 6
- headcount growth: +11.6% against -44.7%
- LinkedIn following: 13,017 against 4,044
Finclude
- domain rating: 33/100 against 12/100
At a glance
| Measure | Final | Finclude |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Algorithmic trading firm specializing in high-frequency trading (HFT) using machine learning. | AI-powered credit scoring for individuals and businesses without traditional credit history. |
| Category | Fintech, Trading, High Frequency Trading (HFT), Algorithmic Trading | Fintech, Lending, Embedded Finance, AI-Driven Parametric Insurance |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software | platform |
| Founded | 2001 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Not published |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Final | Finclude |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 341 | 6 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +11.6% | -44.7% |
| Total funding | $6.0M | Not published |
| Latest round | Seed | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 13,017 | 4,044 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Final | Finclude |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 67/100 | 13/100 |
| Traction | 54/100 | 8/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 23/100 | 22/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (41/100) | F (39/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 12/100 | 33/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Final | Finclude |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Bootstrap | Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Not detected |
Final vs Finclude: common questions
Which is better, Final or Finclude?
On our 0-100 score Final rates higher (67/100 against 13/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Final and Finclude compare on the numbers?
Final leads on our overall score (67/100 against 13/100), headcount (341 against 6), headcount growth (+11.6% against -44.7%), LinkedIn following (13,017 against 4,044). Finclude leads on domain rating (33/100 against 12/100).
Read the full Final review and pricing or the Finclude review and pricing. You can also browse other Final alternatives we track.