Figure vs Walden Robotics
Figure vs Walden Robotics, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Figure is on 57/100 and Walden Robotics on 57/100.
Where each one leads
Figure
- domain rating: 73/100 against 49/100
- funding raised: $4.0B against $300M
- LinkedIn following: 124,551 against 31
Walden Robotics
- agent readiness: 64/100 against 36/100
At a glance
| Measure | Figure | Walden Robotics |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Building humanoid robots for commercial work, currently deployed at scale with BMW, Mercedes-Benz, and Amazon. | Building and deploying general-purpose robots that continuously learn and improve while performing real work. |
| Category | Robotics, Artificial Intelligence, Hardware, Physical AI | Robotics, Artificial Intelligence, Physical AI, Humanoid Robotics |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Hardware |
| Founded | 2018 | Not published |
| Headquarters | Sunnyvale, United States | Cambridge, USA |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Figure | Walden Robotics |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 673 | Not published |
| Total funding | $4.0B | $300M |
| Latest round | Series B | Funding Round |
| Valuation | $4K | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | 124,551 | 31 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Figure | Walden Robotics |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 57/100 | 57/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 40/100 |
| Team | 20/100 | 10/100 |
| Search visibility | 25/100 | 42/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (36/100) | C (64/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 73/100 | 49/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Figure | Walden Robotics |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Vercel |
| CDN | Vercel | Vercel |
| Frameworks | Next.js | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
What users say
| Measure | Figure | Walden Robotics |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 1 positive, 0 negative across 1 thread | Not published |
“Figure 03 Robot sorting packages while Marc Benioff messes with it. https://x.com/Benioff/status/2036252519308075219”r/nextfuckinglevel
Figure vs Walden Robotics: common questions
Which is better, Figure or Walden Robotics?
Both score the same on our 0-100 rating, so the choice comes down to the 20 data points in the tables above rather than overall company strength.
How do Figure and Walden Robotics compare on the numbers?
Figure leads on domain rating (73/100 against 49/100), funding raised ($4.0B against $300M), LinkedIn following (124,551 against 31). Walden Robotics leads on agent readiness (64/100 against 36/100).
What do real users say about Figure and Walden Robotics?
Figure: 1 positive and 0 negative mentions across 1 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/nextfuckinglevel.
Read the full Figure review and pricing or the Walden Robotics review and pricing. You can also browse other Figure alternatives we track.