Figure vs Saga Robotics
Figure vs Saga Robotics, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Figure is on 57/100 and Saga Robotics on 38/100.
Where each one leads
Figure
- our overall score: 57/100 against 38/100
- domain rating: 73/100 against 40/100
- headcount: 673 against 55
- funding raised: $4.0B against $21.8M
- LinkedIn following: 124,551 against 7,582
Saga Robotics
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 36/100
At a glance
| Measure | Figure | Saga Robotics |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Building humanoid robots for commercial work, currently deployed at scale with BMW, Mercedes-Benz, and Amazon. | Saga Robotics develops autonomous robots for agriculture, specializing in UV-C treatment for powdery mildew and strawberry harvesting. |
| Category | Robotics, Artificial Intelligence, Hardware, Physical AI | Robotics, AgTech, Precision Agriculture, Autonomous Systems |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Hardware |
| Founded | 2018 | Not published |
| Headquarters | Sunnyvale, United States | Ås, Norway |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Figure | Saga Robotics |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 673 | 55 |
| Total funding | $4.0B | $21.8M |
| Latest round | Series B | Not published |
| Valuation | $4K | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 124,551 | 7,582 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Figure | Saga Robotics |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 57/100 | 38/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 54/100 |
| Team | 20/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 25/100 | 22/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 40/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (36/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 73/100 | 40/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Figure | Saga Robotics |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Vercel | Not detected |
| CMS | Not detected | Wix |
| Frameworks | Next.js | Not detected |
| Open source | No | Yes |
What users say
| Measure | Figure | Saga Robotics |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 1 positive, 0 negative across 1 thread | 6 positive, 0 negative across 6 threads |
“Figure 03 Robot sorting packages while Marc Benioff messes with it. https://x.com/Benioff/status/2036252519308075219”r/nextfuckinglevel
“Saga Robotics Raises £8.4M to Prove It.. Meet Thorvald a fleet of autonomous, battery-powered field robots already roaming UK strawberry farms and California vineyards.”r/robots
Figure vs Saga Robotics: common questions
Which is better, Figure or Saga Robotics?
On our 0-100 score Figure rates higher (57/100 against 38/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Figure and Saga Robotics compare on the numbers?
Figure leads on our overall score (57/100 against 38/100), domain rating (73/100 against 40/100), headcount (673 against 55), funding raised ($4.0B against $21.8M), LinkedIn following (124,551 against 7,582). Saga Robotics leads on agent readiness (47/100 against 36/100).
What do real users say about Figure and Saga Robotics?
Figure: 1 positive and 0 negative mentions across 1 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/nextfuckinglevel. Saga Robotics: 6 positive and 0 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/robots.
Read the full Figure review and pricing or the Saga Robotics review and pricing. You can also browse other Figure alternatives we track.