Figure vs Qihan Technology
Figure vs Qihan Technology, compared side by side on 11 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Figure is on 57/100 and Qihan Technology on 7/100.
Where each one leads
Figure
- our overall score: 57/100 against 7/100
- agent readiness: 36/100 against 22/100
- domain rating: 73/100 against 19/100
Qihan Technology
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Figure | Qihan Technology |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Building humanoid robots for commercial work, currently deployed at scale with BMW, Mercedes-Benz, and Amazon. | Qihan Technology offers wheeled humanoid robots like the Sanbot series for tasks in education, security, retail, and healthcare. |
| Category | Robotics, Artificial Intelligence, Hardware, Physical AI | Robotics, Humanoid Robotics, Computer Vision, AI Hardware |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Hardware |
| Founded | 2018 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Sunnyvale, United States | Shenzhen, China |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Figure | Qihan Technology |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 673 | Not published |
| Total funding | $4.0B | Not published |
| Valuation | $4K | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 124,551 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Figure | Qihan Technology |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 57/100 | 7/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | Not published |
| Team | 20/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 25/100 | 8/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (36/100) | F (22/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 73/100 | 19/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Figure | Qihan Technology |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Vercel | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Next.js | Not detected |
What users say
| Measure | Figure | Qihan Technology |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 1 positive, 0 negative across 1 thread | Not published |
“Figure 03 Robot sorting packages while Marc Benioff messes with it. https://x.com/Benioff/status/2036252519308075219”r/nextfuckinglevel
Figure vs Qihan Technology: common questions
Which is better, Figure or Qihan Technology?
On our 0-100 score Figure rates higher (57/100 against 7/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 11 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Figure and Qihan Technology compare on the numbers?
Figure leads on our overall score (57/100 against 7/100), agent readiness (36/100 against 22/100), domain rating (73/100 against 19/100).
What do real users say about Figure and Qihan Technology?
Figure: 1 positive and 0 negative mentions across 1 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/nextfuckinglevel.
Read the full Figure review and pricing or the Qihan Technology review and pricing. You can also browse other Figure alternatives we track.