Figure vs Omron Adept Technology
Figure vs Omron Adept Technology, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Figure is on 57/100 and Omron Adept Technology on 54/100.
Where each one leads
Figure
- our overall score: 57/100 against 54/100
- headcount: 673 against 106
- funding raised: $4.0B against $415M
- LinkedIn following: 124,551 against 17,421
Omron Adept Technology
- agent readiness: 45/100 against 36/100
At a glance
| Measure | Figure | Omron Adept Technology |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Building humanoid robots for commercial work, currently deployed at scale with BMW, Mercedes-Benz, and Amazon. | Provider of industrial robots, autonomous mobile robots, and automation solutions. |
| Category | Robotics, Artificial Intelligence, Hardware, Physical AI | Robotics, Autonomous Mobile Robots, Automation Solutions, Manufacturing Automation |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Hardware, software, services |
| Founded | 2018 | 1983 |
| Headquarters | Sunnyvale, United States | Lisle, USA |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Figure | Omron Adept Technology |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 673 | 106 |
| Total funding | $4.0B | $415M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series B |
| Valuation | $4K | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 124,551 | 17,421 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Figure | Omron Adept Technology |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 57/100 | 54/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 20/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 25/100 | 37/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (36/100) | D (45/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 73/100 | 81/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Figure | Omron Adept Technology |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Self Managed |
| CDN | Vercel | Not detected |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Next.js | Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager |
What users say
| Measure | Figure | Omron Adept Technology |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 1 positive, 0 negative across 1 thread | Not published |
“Figure 03 Robot sorting packages while Marc Benioff messes with it. https://x.com/Benioff/status/2036252519308075219”r/nextfuckinglevel
Figure vs Omron Adept Technology: common questions
Which is better, Figure or Omron Adept Technology?
On our 0-100 score Figure rates higher (57/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Figure and Omron Adept Technology compare on the numbers?
Figure leads on our overall score (57/100 against 54/100), headcount (673 against 106), funding raised ($4.0B against $415M), LinkedIn following (124,551 against 17,421). Omron Adept Technology leads on agent readiness (45/100 against 36/100).
What do real users say about Figure and Omron Adept Technology?
Figure: 1 positive and 0 negative mentions across 1 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/nextfuckinglevel.
Read the full Figure review and pricing or the Omron Adept Technology review and pricing. You can also browse other Figure alternatives we track.