Figure vs Indoor Robotics
Figure vs Indoor Robotics, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Figure is on 57/100 and Indoor Robotics on 55/100.
Where each one leads
Figure
- agent readiness: 36/100 against 22/100
- domain rating: 73/100 against 41/100
- headcount: 673 against 8
- funding raised: $4.0B against $17.7M
- LinkedIn following: 124,551 against 14,378
Indoor Robotics
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Figure | Indoor Robotics |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Building humanoid robots for commercial work, currently deployed at scale with BMW, Mercedes-Benz, and Amazon. | Creator of Tando, an autonomous robot platform for everyday dull, dirty, and dangerous tasks. |
| Category | Robotics, Artificial Intelligence, Hardware, Physical AI | Robotics, Security, Drones, Indoor |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Hardware, Software |
| Founded | 2018 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Sunnyvale, United States | Not published |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Figure | Indoor Robotics |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 673 | 8 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -21.1% |
| Total funding | $4.0B | $17.7M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series A |
| Valuation | $4K | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 124,551 | 14,378 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Figure | Indoor Robotics |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 57/100 | 55/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 46/100 |
| Team | 20/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 25/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (36/100) | F (22/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 73/100 | 41/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Figure | Indoor Robotics |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Vercel | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Next.js | Not detected |
What users say
| Measure | Figure | Indoor Robotics |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 1 positive, 0 negative across 1 thread | 1 positive, 0 negative across 1 thread |
“Figure 03 Robot sorting packages while Marc Benioff messes with it. https://x.com/Benioff/status/2036252519308075219”r/nextfuckinglevel
“Indoor Robotics’ Tando™ drone fleet monitors autonomously MedOne’s data centres for safety and security purposes.”r/UAS
Figure vs Indoor Robotics: common questions
Which is better, Figure or Indoor Robotics?
On our 0-100 score Figure rates higher (57/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Figure and Indoor Robotics compare on the numbers?
Figure leads on agent readiness (36/100 against 22/100), domain rating (73/100 against 41/100), headcount (673 against 8), funding raised ($4.0B against $17.7M), LinkedIn following (124,551 against 14,378).
What do real users say about Figure and Indoor Robotics?
Figure: 1 positive and 0 negative mentions across 1 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/nextfuckinglevel. Indoor Robotics: 1 positive and 0 negative mentions across 1 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/UAS.
Read the full Figure review and pricing or the Indoor Robotics review and pricing. You can also browse other Figure alternatives we track.