Figure Technology vs Uma
Figure Technology vs Uma, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Figure Technology is on 45/100 and Uma on 58/100.
Where each one leads
Figure Technology
- domain rating: 74/100 against 36/100
- headcount: 650 against 29
- funding raised: $965M against $40.0M
- LinkedIn following: 122,556 against 5,831
Uma
- our overall score: 58/100 against 45/100
- agent readiness: 42/100 against 36/100
At a glance
| Measure | Figure Technology | Uma |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered robotics company building humanoid robots for labor-intensive tasks. | Developing advanced physical AI and humanoid robots for industrial and domestic environments, focusing on real-world performance and learning through demonstration. |
| Category | Robotics, Humanoid Robotics, AI Chip, AI Hardware | Robotics, Artificial Intelligence, Deep Tech, Hardware |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Hardware |
| Founded | 2018 | 2025 |
| Headquarters | Sunnyvale, United States | Paris, France |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Figure Technology | Uma |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 650 | 29 |
| Total funding | $965M | $40.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | Seed |
| Valuation | $3 | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | 122,556 | 5,831 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Figure Technology | Uma |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 45/100 | 58/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 53/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 22/100 | 42/100 |
| Quality | 45/100 | 70/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (36/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 74/100 | 36/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Figure Technology | Uma |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Vercel |
| CDN | Vercel | Vercel |
| Frameworks | Next.js | Next.js |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
Figure Technology vs Uma: common questions
Which is better, Figure Technology or Uma?
On our 0-100 score Uma rates higher (58/100 against 45/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Figure Technology and Uma compare on the numbers?
Figure Technology leads on domain rating (74/100 against 36/100), headcount (650 against 29), funding raised ($965M against $40.0M), LinkedIn following (122,556 against 5,831). Uma leads on our overall score (58/100 against 45/100), agent readiness (42/100 against 36/100).
Read the full Figure Technology review and pricing or the Uma review and pricing. You can also browse other Figure Technology alternatives we track.