Figure AI vs Gravis Robotics
Figure AI vs Gravis Robotics, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Figure AI is on 58/100 and Gravis Robotics on 51/100.
Where each one leads
Figure AI
- our overall score: 58/100 against 51/100
- agent readiness: 36/100 against 22/100
- domain rating: 74/100 against 36/100
- headcount: 657 against 65
- LinkedIn following: 123,440 against 13,874
Gravis Robotics
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Figure AI | Gravis Robotics |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Developing advanced humanoid robots for various industries, powered by AI. | Develops advanced robotics and AI for autonomous operations in complex environments. |
| Category | Robotics, Humanoid Robotics, AI, Computer Vision | Robotics, Humanoid Robotics, Industrial Robotics, Autonomous Systems |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Hardware |
| Founded | 2022 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | Sunnyvale, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Figure AI | Gravis Robotics |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 657 | 65 |
| Total funding | Not published | $248M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series A |
| Valuation | $2.6B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 123,440 | 13,874 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Figure AI | Gravis Robotics |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 58/100 | 51/100 |
| Traction | 20/100 | 37/100 |
| Team | 50/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 43/100 | 16/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (36/100) | F (22/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 74/100 | 36/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Figure AI | Gravis Robotics |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | AWS |
| CDN | Vercel | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Next.js | Not detected |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
Figure AI vs Gravis Robotics: common questions
Which is better, Figure AI or Gravis Robotics?
On our 0-100 score Figure AI rates higher (58/100 against 51/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Figure AI and Gravis Robotics compare on the numbers?
Figure AI leads on our overall score (58/100 against 51/100), agent readiness (36/100 against 22/100), domain rating (74/100 against 36/100), headcount (657 against 65), LinkedIn following (123,440 against 13,874).
Read the full Figure AI review and pricing or the Gravis Robotics review and pricing. You can also browse other Figure AI alternatives we track.