Fieldlens vs Raken
Fieldlens vs Raken, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Fieldlens is on 59/100 and Raken on 62/100.
Where each one leads
Fieldlens
- funding raised: $17.7M against $12.0M
Raken
- headcount: 153 against 99
- LinkedIn following: 11,147 against 8,652
At a glance
| Measure | Fieldlens | Raken |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Real-time jobsite collaboration software connecting field and office teams in construction. | Construction field management software for daily reporting, time tracking, and safety. |
| Category | Construction Tech, Vertical SaaS, Project Management, Collaboration Software | Construction Tech, Vertical SaaS, Project Management, Field Service Management |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2010 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Tampa, United States | Salt Lake City, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Fieldlens | Raken |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 99 | 153 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -7.4% |
| Total funding | $17.7M | $12.0M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 8,652 | 11,147 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Fieldlens | Raken |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 59/100 | 62/100 |
| Traction | 56/100 | 55/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 25/100 | 31/100 |
| Quality | 62/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | D (49/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 55/100 | 59/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Fieldlens | Raken |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | CloudFront |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Alpinejs, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
What users say
| Measure | Fieldlens | Raken |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 1 positive, 0 negative across 3 threads | Not published |
“WeWork has acquired 21 startups in the last four years, from a college messaging service to a real estate investing app. Here's everything WeWork has bought.. Spacious SpaceIQ Waltz Prolific Interactive Islands Media Managed by Q Euclid Ana”r/buzzfeedbot
Fieldlens vs Raken: common questions
Which is better, Fieldlens or Raken?
On our 0-100 score Raken rates higher (62/100 against 59/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Fieldlens and Raken compare on the numbers?
Fieldlens leads on funding raised ($17.7M against $12.0M). Raken leads on headcount (153 against 99), LinkedIn following (11,147 against 8,652).
What do real users say about Fieldlens and Raken?
Fieldlens: 1 positive and 0 negative mentions across 3 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/buzzfeedbot.
Read the full Fieldlens review and pricing or the Raken review and pricing. You can also browse other Fieldlens alternatives we track.