Fieldlens vs ProVision
Fieldlens vs ProVision, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Fieldlens is on 59/100 and ProVision on 56/100.
Where each one leads
Fieldlens
- our overall score: 59/100 against 56/100
- domain rating: 55/100 against 36/100
- headcount: 99 against 1
- funding raised: $17.7M against $8.5M
ProVision
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Fieldlens | ProVision |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Real-time jobsite collaboration software connecting field and office teams in construction. | AI-powered co-pilot platform designed to streamline pre-construction estimating workflows for construction professionals. |
| Category | Construction Tech, Vertical SaaS, Project Management, Collaboration Software | Construction Tech, Vertical SaaS, AI Copilot, Risk Management |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2010 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | Tampa, United States | Toronto, Canada |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Fieldlens | ProVision |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 99 | 1 |
| Total funding | $17.7M | $8.5M |
| Latest round | Series A | Seed |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | 8,652 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Fieldlens | ProVision |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 59/100 | 56/100 |
| Traction | 56/100 | 38/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 25/100 | 13/100 |
| Quality | 62/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | D (45/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 55/100 | 36/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Fieldlens | ProVision |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Google Cloud |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager, Reddit Pixel |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
What users say
| Measure | Fieldlens | ProVision |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 1 positive, 0 negative across 3 threads | Not published |
“WeWork has acquired 21 startups in the last four years, from a college messaging service to a real estate investing app. Here's everything WeWork has bought.. Spacious SpaceIQ Waltz Prolific Interactive Islands Media Managed by Q Euclid Ana”r/buzzfeedbot
Fieldlens vs ProVision: common questions
Which is better, Fieldlens or ProVision?
On our 0-100 score Fieldlens rates higher (59/100 against 56/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Fieldlens and ProVision compare on the numbers?
Fieldlens leads on our overall score (59/100 against 56/100), domain rating (55/100 against 36/100), headcount (99 against 1), funding raised ($17.7M against $8.5M).
What do real users say about Fieldlens and ProVision?
Fieldlens: 1 positive and 0 negative mentions across 3 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/buzzfeedbot.
Read the full Fieldlens review and pricing or the ProVision review and pricing. You can also browse other Fieldlens alternatives we track.